| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "kcai(at)wyebot(dot)com" <kcai(at)wyebot(dot)com>, "pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: A typo? |
| Date: | 2024-04-07 15:02:35 |
| Message-ID: | 2843228.1712502155@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
"David G. Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Saturday, April 6, 2024, PG Doc comments form <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org>
> wrote:
>> Under 43.3.1, "Notice that we omitted RETURNS real — we could have included
>> it, but it would be redundant."
>> Should that be "RETURNS tax" instead of "RETURNS real"?
> The docs are correct.
Specifically, that bit is a declaration of the data type of the
function's result, not a specification of how to compute it.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David G. Johnston | 2024-04-07 15:11:21 | Re: A typo? |
| Previous Message | jian he | 2024-04-07 14:24:11 | Re: A typo? |