Re: Fix for log_min_error_messages

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fix for log_min_error_messages
Date: 2003-01-29 19:16:51
Message-ID: 28429.1043867811@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>> I now realize panic isn't really off, but I don't expect panic to happen
>> too often. :-)

> Just add a level past panic that actually says "off" and really is off.

Would anyone actually use it? *Should* anyone actually use it?
I cannot imagine a situation where you don't want to see panic messages
(besides, there's always the option of routing the log to /dev/null...)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 2003-01-29 19:47:01 Re: Win32 port patches submitted
Previous Message Chris Smith 2003-01-29 19:00:13 Re: JDBC drivers and streaming content