| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Loftis <mloftis(at)wgops(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Coster/planner and edge cases... |
| Date: | 2002-04-21 23:05:35 |
| Message-ID: | 28422.1019430335@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Loftis <mloftis(at)wgops(dot)com> writes:
> IE I'd like to have the information come back as say a notice or maybe
> as extra information for an EXPLAIN for my purposes, but unless there is
> interest, consensus on how it should be done, and a TODO item made of
> it, I won't be making a patch of that, no reason to clutter the backend
> with stuff that hopefully won't be needed for long :)
I think it'd be useful to have, actually, as long as we're not talking
about much code bloat. I tend to try to find a way to see what I want
with EXPLAIN, because using OPTIMIZER_DEBUG is such a pain. But it's
often difficult to force the plan I'm interested in to rise to the top.
A nicer user interface for looking at the rejected alternatives would
seem like a step forward to me, whether or not ordinary users have any
need for it...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2002-04-21 23:22:40 | Re: GUC vs variable.c (was Patches applied...) |
| Previous Message | Michael Loftis | 2002-04-21 22:52:23 | Re: Patches applied; initdb time! |