Re: exposing pg_controldata and pg_config as functions

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: exposing pg_controldata and pg_config as functions
Date: 2016-01-16 23:48:46
Message-ID: 283A11ED-E08A-4560-819C-D52977DF0E81@anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On January 17, 2016 12:46:36 AM GMT+01:00, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
, but we surely do not want to give away
>checkpoint and recovery information.

Why is that? A lot of that information is available anyway?

---
Please excuse brevity and formatting - I am writing this on my mobile phone.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Corey Huinker 2016-01-17 00:47:21 Re: Declarative partitioning
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2016-01-16 23:46:36 Re: exposing pg_controldata and pg_config as functions