| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: buildfarm git references pointing at github? |
| Date: | 2017-03-14 14:15:55 |
| Message-ID: | 28392.1489500955@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> As for use of github, its use is hardcoded in the case of multi-commit
> changesets because I don't know a way to make the standard gitweb
> display those, although it might exist. And TBH github's display of
> indiviual commits is lots nicer, too. Compare
> <https://github.com/postgres/postgres/commit/a82178020de2c4b3576d0a079e11a431e382e4de>
> with
> <https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=a82178020de2c4b3576d0a079e11a431e382e4de>
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder I guess, but to me the first one
is a prime example of crappy webdesign --- too busy, too convinced that
randomly colored backgrounds and legibility-killing font coloring choices
are great ideas. I really would rather not be directed to github when
checking on our commits.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2017-03-14 14:27:50 | Re: buildfarm git references pointing at github? |
| Previous Message | Justin Clift | 2017-03-14 14:10:57 | Re: buildfarm git references pointing at github? |