| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Rainer Mager" <rmager(at)vgkk(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Dead locks |
| Date: | 2001-03-26 14:50:23 |
| Message-ID: | 28372.985618223@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
"Rainer Mager" <rmager(at)vgkk(dot)com> writes:
> We're using PG 7.0 and 7.1beta and are having dead lock problems. The docs
> say the Postgres detects dead locks and automatically rolls back 1
> transaction to recover but this is not our experience. Are the docs
> incorrect or is this more serious?
Which beta release?
There are some known undetected-deadlock cases in 7.0, which were
repaired in late January --- that would have been beta4 or possibly
beta5, I forget now. If you still see this behavior with 7.1RC1 then
I would like details.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Francesco Protano | 2001-03-26 16:18:20 | Please help On Alternative Database Location |
| Previous Message | Karel Zak | 2001-03-26 13:47:38 | Re: date_part('dow', '2001-03-25') ??! |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pete Forman | 2001-03-26 14:58:53 | IANA registration |
| Previous Message | pejac | 2001-03-26 12:34:52 | re : Prob with regexp |