Re: [RFC] Should we fix postmaster to avoid slow shutdown?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Should we fix postmaster to avoid slow shutdown?
Date: 2016-11-23 15:45:19
Message-ID: 28370.1479915919@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> This would also reduce the amount of data that we need to write to WAL,
> although I'm not sure the amount is actually a problem. I've seen
> instances with ~500MB stat files, but those were instances with hundreds
> of databases, each with many thousands of objects.

Hm, was this before we split up the stats file per-database?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kostiantyn Nemchenko 2016-11-23 15:55:38 Typo in comment in file analyze.c [master branch]
Previous Message Tom Lane 2016-11-23 15:39:28 Re: Patch to implement pg_current_logfile() function