| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Matthew Hagerty <matthew(at)venux(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [INTERFACES] What's that query limit again? |
| Date: | 1999-02-25 15:01:53 |
| Message-ID: | 28332.919954913@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-interfaces |
Matthew Hagerty <matthew(at)venux(dot)net> writes:
> The query limit is 8K right? What about the size of rows returned by a
> select?
There's an 8K limit on the text of a submitted query (I hope to
eliminate that soon, but probably not in time for 6.5). As far as
I can think offhand, there is no a-priori limit on the size of a
query result in either columns or rows.
(Well, I notice a 16-bit column count in T messages, so the FE/BE
protocol will break at 32K or 64K columns in a result, but hopefully
no one will ever run into that...)
Have you tried it? An experiment would've taken less time than
querying the list, I'm sure.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Davis | 1999-02-25 15:32:20 | Foreign Keys |
| Previous Message | Margarita Barvinok | 1999-02-25 14:26:50 | [INTERFACES]- SELECT statement |