From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Billy G(dot) Allie" <Bill(dot)Allie(at)mug(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: |
Date: | 2002-12-23 02:26:33 |
Message-ID: | 28332.1040610393@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
"Billy G. Allie" <Bill(dot)Allie(at)mug(dot)org> writes:
> I have a question about the behavior of the array input routine. How should
> the input string, '{abc"def,defghi",jklmnop}' be parsed? I would think it
> should produce '{"abc\"def","defghi\"","jklmnop"}', but it currently (as of
> 7.3) produces '{"abcdef,defghi","jklmnop"}'.
As did 7.2. Previous releases (at least back to 7.0, the oldest I have
handy to test) did this:
regression=# select '{abc"def,defghi",jklmnop}'::text[];
?column?
--------------------------
{"def,defghi","jklmnop"}
(1 row)
which is certainly pretty bogus, but it established the precedent that a
double-quoted string could be a substring of an array element, and more
specifically that double-quote didn't stop being special just because it
wasn't the first character of the element string.
> Which should be the correct behavior?
I can't see any strong argument in favor of your proposed change. I can
tell you that we will get beat up about it if we change anything in this
line --- so you'd better muster a pretty strong argument.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-12-23 02:36:27 | Re: PerformPortalClose warning in 7.3 |
Previous Message | Gerhard Haering | 2002-12-23 01:18:46 | Re: PerformPortalClose warning in 7.3 |