From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Allow tests to pass in OpenSSL FIPS mode |
Date: | 2023-02-27 07:23:34 |
Message-ID: | 282ea9bc-417a-e150-7eb7-5a5298e9d991@enterprisedb.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 27.02.23 08:16, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 01:16:18PM +0200, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> However, there are some changes in brin_multi.out that are quite
>> surprising and suggest that we might have bugs in brin:
>>
>> +WARNING: unexpected number of results 31 for (macaddr8col,>,macaddr8,b1:d1:0e:7b:af:a4:42:12,33)
>> +WARNING: unexpected number of results 17 for (macaddr8col,>=,macaddr8,d9:35:91:bd:f7:86:0e:1e,15)
>> +WARNING: unexpected number of results 11 for (macaddr8col,<=,macaddr8,23:e8:46:63:86:07:ad:cb,13)
>> +WARNING: unexpected number of results 4 for (macaddr8col,<,macaddr8,13:16:8e:6a:2e:6c:84:b4,6)
>
> This refers to brin_minmax_multi_distance_macaddr8(), no? This is
> amazing. I have a hard time imagining how FIPS would interact with
> what we do in mac8.c to explain that, so it may be something entirely
> different. Is that reproducible?
This is no longer present in the v2 patch.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2023-02-27 07:33:13 | Re: pg_rewind: warn when checkpoint hasn't happened after promotion |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2023-02-27 07:16:00 | Re: Allow tests to pass in OpenSSL FIPS mode |