Re: OK, so culicidae is *still* broken

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: OK, so culicidae is *still* broken
Date: 2017-04-15 21:09:38
Message-ID: 2829.1492290578@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> That seems quite reasonable. I'm afraid we're going to have to figure
> out something similar, but more robust, for windows soon-ish :/

Why doesn't Windows' ability to map the segment into the new process
before it executes take care of that?

> As a minor point, it'd probably be good to add addr=%zu, requestedAddress
> or such.

Yeah, I'd come to the same conclusion right after sending that.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2017-04-15 21:18:10 Re: OK, so culicidae is *still* broken
Previous Message Andres Freund 2017-04-15 21:06:43 Re: OK, so culicidae is *still* broken