Re: why does this not give a syntax error?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Scott Ribe <scott_ribe(at)elevated-dev(dot)com>
Cc: Postgresql General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: why does this not give a syntax error?
Date: 2013-06-10 19:22:34
Message-ID: 28276.1370892154@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Scott Ribe <scott_ribe(at)elevated-dev(dot)com> writes:
> On Jun 10, 2013, at 12:52 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> "11825657and" is not any more lexically ambiguous than "11825657+".
>> It has to be two separate tokens, and that's how it's read.

> But it's not read correctly.

[ shrug... ] Works for me. You want to put together a self-contained
test case showing differently?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sajeev Mayandi 2013-06-10 22:02:19 updatable view
Previous Message Scott Ribe 2013-06-10 19:16:05 Re: why does this not give a syntax error?