| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org (Neil Conway) |
| Cc: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Trim the Fat (Was: Re: Open 7.3 items ) |
| Date: | 2002-07-31 15:05:45 |
| Message-ID: | 28268.1028127945@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org (Neil Conway) writes:
> Mentioning that on -hackers would have been nice -- I've spent a while
> this week hacking autoconf / Makefiles to integrate libpqxx...
Marc's opinion is not the same thing as a done deal ;-) --- we still
have to discuss this, and if someone's already doing the integration
work I think that's an important factor.
> If we're going to start removing interfaces, I'd vote for the removal of
> perl5 & libpq++ as well as libpqxx.
Agreed on that point. We shouldn't be promoting old, crufty interface
libraries when there are better ones available.
I would personally prefer to see libpqxx integrated now, and then we
could plan to remove libpq++ in a release or two (after giving people
a reasonable opportunity to switch over). If anyone still cares about
libpq++ at that point, it could be given a home on gborg.
One reason for wanting to integrate libpqxx is that I don't think we'll
find out anything about its portability until we get a lot of people
trying to build it. If it's a separate distro that won't happen quickly.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-07-31 15:09:58 | Re: WAL file location |
| Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2002-07-31 14:55:00 | Re: Trim the Fat (Was: Re: Open 7.3 items ) |