Re: [HACKERS] new return value of PQfsize

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Edmund Mergl <E(dot)Mergl(at)bawue(dot)de>
Cc: PostgreSQL Developers Mailinglist <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] new return value of PQfsize
Date: 1998-09-09 14:05:42
Message-ID: 28265.905349942@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Edmund Mergl <E(dot)Mergl(at)bawue(dot)de> writes:
> the libpq-function PQfsize() now returns int instead of
> short. It looks like, that this needs some adaption in the
> backend, because now the size of a variable length field is
> returned as 65535 instead of -1.

Oops. That's libpq's bug, not the backend's.

I thought that the rearrangement of libpq's interface
would be a good time to hide the fact that field sizes are
currently restricted to short --- which was visible in the
return type of PQfsize, and nowhere else in libpq's API.

But I guess I forgot to ensure that sign extension would happen
correctly :-(. Will fix.

regards, tom lane

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 1998-09-09 14:14:08 Re: [HACKERS] Indixing problems...
Previous Message Edmund Mergl 1998-09-09 13:07:05 new return value of PQfsize