Re: APC/socket fix (final?)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
Cc: "Claudio Natoli" <claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: APC/socket fix (final?)
Date: 2004-03-26 23:06:16
Message-ID: 28265.1080342376@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

"Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> writes:
>>> Hopeless, or cute, work-around?
>>
>> It's possibly workable in the limited context of the postmaster, but
>> I've got doubts about doing it in libpq where we can't assume we know
>> what the surrounding application will do.

> No need to touch the frontend parts at all. Our APCs are server side
> only, so it's not a problem there.

Oh really? What if the surrounding app uses APCs?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Claudio Natoli 2004-03-26 23:12:12 Re: APC/socket fix (final?)
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2004-03-26 23:04:32 Re: APC/socket fix (final?)