| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com |
| Cc: | "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Nicolai Tufar" <ntufar(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "PostgreSQL Win32 port list" <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression tests |
| Date: | 2005-03-11 03:58:27 |
| Message-ID: | 28236.1110513507@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32 pgsql-patches |
pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com writes:
>>> Please see my posting about using a macro for snprintf.
> Wasn't the issue about odd behavior of the Win32 linker choosing the wrong
> vnsprintf?
You're right, the point about the macro was to avoid linker weirdness on
Windows. We need to do that part in any case. I think Bruce confused
that issue with the one about whether our version supported %n$
adequately ... which it doesn't just yet ...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-03-11 04:10:12 | Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression |
| Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2005-03-11 03:40:09 | Re: SQL99 Hierarchical queries |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-03-11 04:10:12 | Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression |
| Previous Message | pgsql | 2005-03-11 01:29:49 | Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-03-11 04:10:12 | Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression |
| Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2005-03-11 03:54:50 | Re: trivial refactoring of WaitOnLock |