From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | dwilches(at)gmail(dot)com |
Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #16293: postgres segfaults and returns SQLSTATE 08006 |
Date: | 2020-03-10 22:19:51 |
Message-ID: | 28203.1583878791@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
PG Bug reporting form <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> I finally found the issue was that one of the tests was trying to insert a
> row on a partitioned table, but there was no partition where to put that
> row, so it had to go to the default partition. But, the default partition
> had a constraint that disallowed that row, so the row couldn't be inserted
> and Postgres ended with a segfault.
Hm, works for me:
regression=# create table tt (f1 int, f2 text) partition by list(f1);
CREATE TABLE
regression=# create table t1 partition of tt for values in (1);
CREATE TABLE
regression=# create table tother partition of tt default;
CREATE TABLE
regression=# alter table tother add check (length(f2) > 1);
ALTER TABLE
regression=# insert into tt values (1, 'f');
INSERT 0 1
regression=# insert into tt values (3, 'f');
ERROR: new row for relation "tother" violates check constraint "tother_f2_check"
DETAIL: Failing row contains (3, f).
regression=#
Admittedly this is v11 branch tip not exactly 11.7, but I don't see
anything related-looking in the commit log. So I think there is some
contributing factor you didn't mention. Could you provide a
self-contained reproduction script?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Daniel WM | 2020-03-10 23:04:48 | Re: BUG #16293: postgres segfaults and returns SQLSTATE 08006 |
Previous Message | PG Bug reporting form | 2020-03-10 21:13:24 | BUG #16293: postgres segfaults and returns SQLSTATE 08006 |