| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Win32 port list <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] SRA Win32 sync() code |
| Date: | 2003-11-16 16:32:59 |
| Message-ID: | 28203.1069000379@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32 pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Not sure how we are going to do this in Win32, but somehow we will have
> to record all open files between checkpoints in an area that the
> checkpoint process can read during a checkpoint.
One reason I like the idea of adopting a sync-when-you-write policy is
that it eliminates the need for anything as messy as that.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-11-16 16:36:54 | Re: [PATCHES] SRA Win32 sync() code |
| Previous Message | Dennis Bjorklund | 2003-11-16 15:51:49 | Re: start of transaction (was: Re: [PERFORM] Help with |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-11-16 16:36:54 | Re: [PATCHES] SRA Win32 sync() code |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-11-16 05:00:56 | SRA Win32 sync() code |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-11-16 16:36:54 | Re: [PATCHES] SRA Win32 sync() code |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-11-16 16:21:58 | Re: SIGPIPE handling |