Re: Interpreting vacuum verbosity

From: Jeff Boes <jboes(at)nexcerpt(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Interpreting vacuum verbosity
Date: 2004-05-07 18:22:40
Message-ID: 281c7eaf507936f5710dcbda7fdc20bb@news.teranews.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

At some point in time, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us (Tom Lane) wrote:

>
>> max_fsm_relations = 1000 and max_fsm_pages = 10000.
>
>Also you doubtless need max_fsm_pages a lot higher than that. A
>conservative setting would make it as big as your whole database,
>eg for a 10Gb disk footprint use 10Gb/8K (something upwards of
>a million) FSM page slots.

At some point, someone was going to write a "white paper" detailing how one
might go about setting these parameters. If that someone has done so, I'd love
to hear about it. If that someone hasn't ... well, how much beer would we have
to provide to get you to talk? 8-)

--
Jeff Boes vox 269.226.9550 ext 24
Database Engineer fax 269.349.9076
Nexcerpt, Inc. http://www.nexcerpt.com
...Nexcerpt... Extend your Expertise

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ed L. 2004-05-07 18:23:02 Re: Interpreting vacuum verbosity
Previous Message Ed L. 2004-05-07 18:20:10 Re: Interpreting vacuum verbosity