Re: [PATCH] lock_timeout and common SIGALRM framework

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lock_timeout and common SIGALRM framework
Date: 2012-12-08 18:32:09
Message-ID: 28191.1354991529@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at> writes:
> Thanks. I just tried the patch on current GIT HEAD and
> gives some offset warnings but no rejects. Also, it compiles
> without warnings and still works as it should.
> Should I post a new patch that applies cleanly?

Offsets are not a problem --- if you tried to keep them exact you'd just
be making a lot of unnecessary updates. If there were fuzz warnings I'd
be more concerned.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Farina 2012-12-08 18:40:12 Sketch of a Hook into the Logging Collector
Previous Message Boszormenyi Zoltan 2012-12-08 17:42:45 Re: [PATCH] lock_timeout and common SIGALRM framework