From: | Glyn Astill <glynastill(at)yahoo(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, david(at)lang(dot)hm, Steve Clark <sclark(at)netwolves(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency. |
Date: | 2011-04-12 16:01:49 |
Message-ID: | 281886.96944.qm@web26007.mail.ukl.yahoo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
--- On Tue, 12/4/11, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >>> Can we see some iobound and cpubound pgbench
> runs on both
> >>> servers?
> >>>
> >>
> >> Of course, I'll post when I've gotten to that.
> >
> > Ok, there's no writing going on -- so the i/o tets
> aren't necessary.
> > Context switches are also not too high -- the problem
> is likely in
> > postgres or on your end.
> >
> > However, I Would still like to see:
> > pgbench select only tests:
> > pgbench -i -s 1
> > pgbench -S -c 8 -t 500
> > pgbench -S -c 32 -t 500
> > pgbench -S -c 80 -t 500
> >
> > pgbench -i -s 500
> > pgbench -S -c 8 -t 500
> > pgbench -S -c 32 -t 500
> > pgbench -S -c 80 -t 500
> >
> > write out bench.sql with:
> > begin;
> > select * from heavy_seat_function();
> > select * from heavy_seat_function();
> > commit;
> >
> > pgbench -n bench.sql -c 8 -t 500
> > pgbench -n bench.sql -c 8 -t 500
> > pgbench -n bench.sql -c 8 -t 500
>
> whoops:
> pgbench -n bench.sql -c 8 -t 500
> pgbench -n bench.sql -c 32 -t 500
> pgbench -n bench.sql -c 80 -t 500
>
> merlin
>
Right, here they are:
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Glyn Astill | 2011-04-12 16:07:00 | Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency. |
Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2011-04-12 14:43:01 | Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency. |