From: | Воронин Дмитрий <carriingfate92(at)yandex(dot)ru> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: ereport bug |
Date: | 2015-01-15 12:22:03 |
Message-ID: | 2817001421324523@web25h.yandex.ru |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello all
I see your patch, Tom. It works on my postgres 9.4 (intel x86_64). I write a letter if I can test it on others platform.
Thank you!
14.01.2015, 21:40, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 6:27 AM, Dmitry Voronin
>> <carriingfate92(at)yandex(dot)ru> wrote:
>>> I am attaching to this letter a test case that shows the behavior
>>> errcontext() macro and the way to fix it.
>> So the upshot of this is that given errfinish(A, B, C), where A, B,
>> and C are expressions, my gcc is choosing to evaluate C, then B, then
>> A, then the errfinish call itself. But whoever wrote the errcontext()
>> macro evidently thought, in this kind of situation, the compiler would
>> be certain to evaluate A, then B, then C, then errfinish. But it
>> doesn't.
>
> http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=1f9bf05e539646103c518bcbb49c04919b238f7a
>
> regards, tom lane
--
С уважением, Дмитрий Воронин
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | M Tarkeshwar Rao | 2015-01-15 12:22:29 | can you have any idea about toast missing chunk issu resolution |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2015-01-15 12:06:53 | Re: Fillfactor for GIN indexes |