| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Frans Van Elsacker <fve(at)atbib(dot)be> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] union problem version 6.5.3 |
| Date: | 1999-11-12 23:58:59 |
| Message-ID: | 28156.942451139@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Frans Van Elsacker <fve(at)atbib(dot)be> writes:
> Our earlier version was postgresql 6.4.2
OK, I thought the change was older than that. It probably got into 6.5
as a side-effect of incorporating the INTERSECT/EXCEPT feature. Anyway,
we ought to try to restore the old functionality.
regards, tom lane
>> Hmm, the grammar has
>>
>> CreateAsStmt: CREATE OptTemp TABLE relation_name OptCreateAs AS SubSelect
>>
>> and SubSelect doesn't allow unions. This is overly restrictive,
>> I agree, but I thought it had been that way for a good while.
>> What version were you using before?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jan Wieck | 1999-11-13 01:43:47 | Re: [HACKERS] compression in LO and other fields |
| Previous Message | Frans Van Elsacker | 1999-11-12 23:31:30 | Re: [HACKERS] union problem version 6.5.3 |