| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> | 
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> | 
| Cc: | pinker <pinker(at)onet(dot)eu>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> | 
| Subject: | Re: Interval - incorrect grammar form | 
| Date: | 2015-07-17 03:43:53 | 
| Message-ID: | 28147.1437104633@sss.pgh.pa.us | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs | 
Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 4:56 PM, pinker <pinker(at)onet(dot)eu> wrote:
>> I've noticed that interval is shown incorrectly (in plural form) when date
>> is negative:
>> 
>> select age(timestamp '2015-09-01',timestamp '2017-10-02');
>> gives:
>> "-2 years -1 *mons* -1 days"
> It behaves like this for ages, and there are some applications that
> surely rely on the current behavior, so I am not sure that it is worth
> changing now even if that's grammatically incorrect (native
> English-speaker wanted here for confirmation).
Hm, "-1 mon" is probably better than "-1 mons", but it's somewhat
debatable; it's not clear to me that the convention about singular nouns
applies to negative quantities.  And if you were arguing from
native-language conventions then writing "mon" rather than "month"
already feels pretty unnatural.
I tend to agree that backwards compatibility outweighs any benefit
we'd get here.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeevan Chalke | 2015-07-17 06:07:26 | Re: [HACKERS] Grouping Sets: Fix unrecognized node type bug | 
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2015-07-17 02:39:23 | Re: Interval - incorrect grammar form |