From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Karl O(dot) Pinc" <kop(at)meme(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>, Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: proposal: minscale, rtrim, btrim functions for numeric |
Date: | 2020-01-06 17:22:50 |
Message-ID: | 28099.1578331370@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> út 10. 12. 2019 v 13:56 odesílatel Karl O. Pinc <kop(at)meme(dot)com> napsal:
>> I'm marking it ready for a committer.
> Thank you for review
Pushed with minor adjustments. Notably, I didn't like having
get_min_scale() depend on its callers having stripped trailing zeroes
to avoid getting into a tight infinite loop. That's just trouble
waiting to happen, especially since non-stripped numerics are seldom
seen in practice (ones coming into the SQL-level functions should
never look like that, ie the strip_var calls you had are almost
certainly dead code). If we did have a code path where the situation
could occur, and somebody forgot the strip_var call, the omission
could easily escape notice. So I got rid of the strip_var calls and
made get_min_scale() defend itself against the case. It's hardly
any more code, and it should be a shade faster than strip_var anyway.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2020-01-06 17:25:19 | Re: Assert failure due to "drop schema pg_temp_3 cascade" for temporary tables and \d+ is not showing any info after drooping temp table schema |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2020-01-06 16:29:02 | Re: Removing pg_pltemplate and creating "trustable" extensions |