Re: row_security GUC does not behave as documented

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: row_security GUC does not behave as documented
Date: 2016-01-04 03:52:04
Message-ID: 28095.1451879524@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Well, I tried changing the code to act the way I gather it should, and
>> it breaks a whole bunch of regression test cases. See attached.

> I think this means we need to postpone 9.5.0 for a week.

I think the regression cases are not that big a deal to fix, but
I'd rather that the original authors did it, as I might miss what
they intended to test.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2016-01-04 03:56:49 Re: row_security GUC does not behave as documented
Previous Message Tom Lane 2016-01-04 03:47:07 Re: 9.5 BLOCKER: regrole and regnamespace and quotes