Re: Interrupts vs signals

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Subject: Re: Interrupts vs signals
Date: 2024-07-29 17:24:21
Message-ID: 2808469.1722273861@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I wonder how this works right now. Is there something that limits the
> number of authentication requests that can be in flight concurrently,
> or is it completely uncapped (except by machine resources)?

The former. IIRC, the postmaster won't spawn more than 2X max_connections
subprocesses (don't recall the exact limit, but it's around there).

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rui Zhao 2024-07-29 17:25:02 Re:Detach shared memory in Postmaster child if not needed
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2024-07-29 17:18:22 Re: Interrupts vs signals