Re: Nearing final release?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)oryx(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Nearing final release?
Date: 2004-10-16 22:41:05
Message-ID: 2806.1097966465@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> writes:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> * synchonize supported encodings and docs

> Is this Abhijit's patch to add PQprepare() and PQsendPrepare()?

No ... does it look like it?

> I'm not sure whether the patch he sent is adequate, I looked at it
> myself and was a bit skeptical. But he said my concerns were
> misplaced.

[ looks... ] The patch is definitely broken as-is, because it changes
the application-visible behavior of existing functions --- in particular
PQsendQueryParams() followed by PQgetResult() will now return a bogus
additional PGresult. I think the cleanest solution is probably to add a
state flag indicating whether ParseComplete should generate a PGresult
or not.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dann Corbit 2004-10-16 23:04:30 Re: Nearing final release?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-10-16 22:22:57 Re: win32 pg_autovacuum make error

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2004-10-17 05:10:14 Re: Nearing final release?
Previous Message Greg Stark 2004-10-16 21:42:46 Re: Nearing final release?