From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Inconsistency between postgresql.conf and docs |
Date: | 2011-07-07 20:06:41 |
Message-ID: | 28031.1310069201@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> On tor, 2011-07-07 at 13:26 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> OK, so the plan is to move these settings into a separate top-level
>> group "Replication", and sub-divide into master and standby settings,
> Most of the messages use the term "primary" rather than "master". I
> think there was a discussion in 9.0 in favor of that term.
Well, there seems to be a lot more usage of the term "master" than
the other in the docs ...
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2011-07-07 20:09:49 | Re: spurious use of %m format in pg_upgrade |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2011-07-07 19:58:49 | excessive backpatching of gitignore files |