| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, PostgreSQL WWW Mailing List <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: "current" interactive docs busted |
| Date: | 2005-01-05 15:28:11 |
| Message-ID: | 28020.1104938891@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> writes:
>>> From a "just had an idea" point of view, if the dev docs allowed
>>> comments, it might make for an interesting way of getting people to
>>> review and contribute to them prior to each official release.
> Would the idea make sense when we're not in release mode? I mean Dave
> had loaded the docs included with RC1, but once 8.0 goes out this would
> mean loading docs that would have to be built from cvs every day (or
> maybe even more often than that). I see issues with page names and
> content changing during development that make me unsure how useful this
> would be in practice.
Good point. And it wouldn't be a whole lot better in "release mode",
either, because we tend to make pushes on the documentation during that
timeframe. I did some rearrangement just a few days ago ...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Steve Simms | 2005-01-05 15:52:24 | Gborg down |
| Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2005-01-05 14:12:47 | Re: Need to know final URLs for press kits |