| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Radek Strnad <radek(dot)strnad(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: WIP patch: Collation support |
| Date: | 2008-09-02 19:01:53 |
| Message-ID: | 2801.1220382113@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> writes:
> And I think that's backwards. Why can we only use a feature once every
> OS out there implements it? We still run on systems that don't have SSL
> support. LC_TYPE settings are not portable between systems, yet that
> doesn't bother anyone. Why should we have a problem with collate
> settings not being portable?
If we're going to approach it that way, we need a syntax for CREATE
COLLATION that doesn't hard-wire what the possible collation modifiers
are.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Zdenek Kotala | 2008-09-02 19:21:24 | Re: Page layout footprint |
| Previous Message | Markus Wanner | 2008-09-02 18:57:38 | Re: Index scan troubles |