| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Pavel Raiskup <praiskup(at)redhat(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, msalter(at)redhat(dot)com |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Add support for TAS/S_UNLOCK for aarch64 |
| Date: | 2013-06-04 17:40:27 |
| Message-ID: | 28009.1370367627@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Pavel Raiskup <praiskup(at)redhat(dot)com> wrote:
>> Oh, I see now it was already consulted here:
>> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1368448758.23422.12.camel@t520.redhat.com
> I think we should go ahead and commit this patch, or some variant of
> it. Having a buildfarm machine would be good... but I don't think
> that should be a prerequisite for this sort of support. We certainly
> have spinlock support for other platforms for which we don't have
> buildfarm machines.
We got no response to the question of whether it couldn't be merged with
the existing ARM32 code block. I'd prefer not to have essentially
duplicate sections in s_lock.h if it's not necessary.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mark Salter | 2013-06-04 18:05:55 | Re: [PATCH] Add support for TAS/S_UNLOCK for aarch64 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2013-06-04 17:25:10 | Re: Configurable location for extension .control files |