Re: gen_random_uuid security not explicit in documentation

From: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
To: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>,rightfold(at)gmail(dot)com,pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org,pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: gen_random_uuid security not explicit in documentation
Date: 2017-06-30 05:24:01
Message-ID: 27A63F09-7496-4693-BE7B-E6C2E2E3969A@iki.fi
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers

On 30 June 2017 06:45:04 EEST, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> wrote:
>This PostgreSQL 10 open item is past due for your status update.
>Kindly send
>a status update within 24 hours, and include a date for your subsequent
>status
>update.

I'll fix this some time next week. (I'm on vacation right now)

- Heikki

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-07-02 04:19:44 Re: Synchronous logical replication?
Previous Message Noah Misch 2017-06-30 03:45:04 Re: gen_random_uuid security not explicit in documentation

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Beena Emerson 2017-06-30 06:26:27 Re: Default Partition for Range
Previous Message Mark Dilger 2017-06-30 05:00:47 Re: Request more documentation for incompatibility of parallelism and plpgsql exec_run_select