| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Group Commit |
| Date: | 2008-03-07 00:57:41 |
| Message-ID: | 27983.1204851461@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com> writes:
> I actually have a paper design for something that builds a little model
> for how likely it is another commit will be coming soon that essentially
> turns this into something that can be tuned automatically, better than any
> person can do it. No idea if I'll actually build that thing, but I hope
> it's obvious that there's some possibility to improve this area for
> applications that can't use async commit. If you're going to dump the
> feature, I'd suggest at least waiting until later in the 8.4 cycle to see
> if something better comes along first.
What about the other idea of just having committers wait for the next
walwriter-cycle flush before reporting commit?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-03-07 00:58:47 | Re: Idle idea for a feature |
| Previous Message | Greg Smith | 2008-03-07 00:35:53 | Re: Group Commit |