From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | David Garamond <lists(at)zara(dot)6(dot)isreserved(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: NULL/0 |
Date: | 2004-09-20 05:16:14 |
Message-ID: | 2796.1095657374@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
David Garamond <lists(at)zara(dot)6(dot)isreserved(dot)com> writes:
> Does anyone know what the SQL standard say (or doesn't say) about
> division by zero for NULL?
You mean NULL/0 ?
SQL99 6.26 <numeric value expression> saith:
General Rules
1) If the value of any <numeric primary> simply contained in a
<numeric value expression> is the null value, then the result of
the <numeric value expression> is the null value.
...
4) The dyadic arithmetic operators <plus sign>, <minus sign>,
<asterisk>, and <solidus> (+, -, *, and /, respectively)
specify addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division,
respectively. If the value of a divisor is zero, then an
exception condition is raised: data exception - division by
zero.
Given the order of those statements, I'd expect NULL/0 to yield NULL.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Neil Conway | 2004-09-20 07:10:54 | Re: Prefetch children |
Previous Message | David Garamond | 2004-09-20 05:00:14 | NULL/0 |