Re: question about about future 8.1 and IN, INOUT, and OUT parameters

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>
Cc: Tony Caduto <tony_caduto(at)amsoftwaredesign(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: question about about future 8.1 and IN, INOUT, and OUT parameters
Date: 2005-04-26 04:52:32
Message-ID: 27958.1114491152@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org> writes:
> On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 11:05:57PM -0500, Tony Caduto wrote:
>> Is the syntax going to be exactly like it is in Oracle?

> I'm not familiar with the Oracle syntax and I don't know how close
> the PostgreSQL implementation is to being final, but here's an
> example that works with the most recent code from HEAD (8.1devel):

> CREATE FUNCTION foo(IN x integer, INOUT y integer, OUT z integer) AS $$

FWIW, we will also take the more Oracle-ish spelling of the parameter
list:

CREATE FUNCTION foo(x IN integer, y IN OUT integer, z OUT integer) AS ...

... although given all the other in-detail discrepancies between plpgsql
and Oracle's pl/sql, I'm not sure how much this will really make
anyone's life easier. In any case, Michael's example is the preferred
syntax because it is what the SQL spec calls for.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-04-26 05:19:53 Re: I can't create a new database with GB18030 encoding
Previous Message Dinesh Pandey 2005-04-26 04:13:02 Postgres source (tar file) for Fedora Core OS?