Re: about truncate

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: about truncate
Date: 2009-01-12 13:22:04
Message-ID: 27914.1231766524@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> Please could we put in a GUC to allow that to be toggled in this release

> That seems like it would just be putting off the pain.

Yes, we already had exactly this discussion and concluded that a GUC
wasn't going to improve matters.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2009-01-12 13:22:49 Re: Recovery Test Framework
Previous Message Koichi Suzuki 2009-01-12 13:20:21 V4 of PITR performance improvement for 8.4