Re: Error-safe user functions

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Ted Yu <yuzhihong(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Amul Sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Nikita Glukhov <n(dot)gluhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Error-safe user functions
Date: 2022-12-23 21:22:47
Message-ID: 2791143.1671830567@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Ted Yu <yuzhihong(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> In makeItemLikeRegex :

> + /* See regexp.c for explanation */
> + CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS();
> + pg_regerror(re_result, &re_tmp, errMsg,
> sizeof(errMsg));
> + ereturn(escontext, false,

> Since an error is returned, I wonder if the `CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS` call is
> still necessary.

Yes, it is. We don't want a query-cancel transformed into a soft error.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ted Yu 2022-12-23 21:25:42 Re: Error-safe user functions
Previous Message Ted Yu 2022-12-23 21:19:07 Re: Error-safe user functions