Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning

From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning
Date: 2018-03-22 04:07:05
Message-ID: 278abb39-d784-bc18-c8cc-c42e3e1e89d1@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2018/03/20 21:41, David Rowley wrote:
> On 21 March 2018 at 00:07, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>> Attached is further revised version.
>
> In the 0004 patch I see:
>
> @@ -1439,6 +1441,10 @@ inheritance_planner(PlannerInfo *root)
> if (IS_DUMMY_PATH(subpath))
> continue;
>
> + /* Add the current parent's RT index to the partitioned rels set. */
> + partitioned_relids = bms_add_member(partitioned_relids,
> + appinfo->parent_relid);
>
> This seems to execute regardless of if the target relation is a
> partitioned table or an inheritance parent. I think there needs to be
> a condition so you only do this when planning for partitioned tables.

Oops, that's quite wrong. Will fix, thanks.

Regards,
Amit

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavan Deolasee 2018-03-22 04:34:51 Re: ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE for partitioned tables
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2018-03-22 03:53:49 Re: faster testing with symlink installs