From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: list rewrite committed |
Date: | 2004-05-28 16:44:35 |
Message-ID: | 27890.1085762675@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> writes:
> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> For instance, here
>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2004-03/msg00696.php are some
>> profiles documenting a case where nearly 40% of the runtime goes into
>> lappend's in 7.4. I haven't had time to repeat the test case but I'd think
>> that time is near-zero in CVS tip.
> Of course now ExecEvalExpr's share of runtime in that test is probably up to
> 28-35% in those tests. Or did you get to doing the things you proposed with
> making it a macro?
I did. I'd like to re-run that test, but have no time for it right now
--- too much to do before feature freeze.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | pgsql | 2004-05-28 16:46:29 | Extended customizing, SQL functions, internal variables, API |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-05-28 16:29:54 | Re: On query rewrite |