Re: wake up logical workers after ALTER SUBSCRIPTION

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Melih Mutlu <m(dot)melihmutlu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: wake up logical workers after ALTER SUBSCRIPTION
Date: 2022-12-14 18:23:18
Message-ID: 2783450.1671042198@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I'm reasonably certain the launcher is already signaled like you describe.
> It'll just wait to start new workers if it's been less than
> wal_retrieve_retry_interval milliseconds since the last time it started
> workers.

Oh. What in the world is the rationale for that?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nathan Bossart 2022-12-14 18:37:59 Re: wake up logical workers after ALTER SUBSCRIPTION
Previous Message Greg Stark 2022-12-14 18:17:28 Re: Temporary tables versus wraparound... again