| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org |
| Cc: | Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: SQL99 time zones |
| Date: | 2001-10-12 18:27:56 |
| Message-ID: | 27819.1002911276@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org> writes:
> I'm working on patches to implement the (slightly brain damaged) SQL9x
> time zone spec. This allows one to specify a numeric time offset for the
> time zone. [ ... ]
> Comments?
While this is doubtless a good thing, I'm starting to feel very itchy
about the fact that we've slipped beta a couple of weeks now while you
hack up "one more" datetime improvement. We've got to have some closure
on this process.
At this point I guess the reasonable thing to do is say "Beta on Monday,
this time for sure!". If you haven't committed these changes by Monday,
I think you should hold them over for 7.3.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephan Szabo | 2001-10-12 18:29:08 | Re: Deadlock? idle in transaction |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-10-12 18:21:03 | Re: Accessing Database files on a "read-only" medium...like |