From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Redundant errdetail prefix "The error was:" in some logical replication messages |
Date: | 2021-03-30 06:10:34 |
Message-ID: | 2781563.1617084634@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> There are a couple of error messages within the logical replication
> code where the errdetail text includes a prefix of "The error was:"
Hmm, isn't project style more usually to include the error reason
in the primary message? That is,
ereport(LOG,
- (errmsg("could not drop the replication slot \"%s\" on publisher",
- slotname),
- errdetail("The error was: %s", res->err)));
+ (errmsg("could not drop the replication slot \"%s\" on publisher: %s",
+ slotname, res->err)));
and so on. If we had reason to think that res->err would be extremely
long, maybe pushing it to errdetail would be sensible, but I'm not
seeing that that is likely.
(I think the "the" before "replication slot" could go away, too.)
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bharath Rupireddy | 2021-03-30 06:21:01 | Re: Redundant errdetail prefix "The error was:" in some logical replication messages |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2021-03-30 06:08:16 | Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables |