From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreas(at)visena(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Query is over 2x slower with jit=on |
Date: | 2018-09-17 21:50:15 |
Message-ID: | 27812.1537221015@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On 11 September 2018 at 14:50, Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On 10 September 2018 at 21:39, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>>> On 2018-09-10 15:42:55 +0530, Amit Khandekar wrote:
>>>> I think we better show per-worker jit info also.
Just to throw a contrarian opinion into this: I find the current EXPLAIN
output for JIT to be insanely verbose already.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2018-09-17 22:00:58 | Re: pgsql: Allow concurrent-safe open() and fopen() in frontend code for Wi |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2018-09-17 21:39:53 | Re: Strange OSX make check-world failure |