Re: array support patch phase 1 patch

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Patches (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: array support patch phase 1 patch
Date: 2003-06-04 22:44:41
Message-ID: 27801.1054766681@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
> The aggregates hacking was a bit convoluted by the desire to support
> polymorphic aggregates using polymorphic functions. You end up with many
> possible states, some of which are invalid because they don't provide
> enough context to resolve the polymorphic types. Any suggestions?

I think we'd be better off leaving that out till we understand it a
little better, then ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2003-06-04 22:49:17 Re: array support patch phase 1 patch
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-06-04 21:47:06 Re: pgstattuple for schemas