Re: cvs chapters in our docs

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: cvs chapters in our docs
Date: 2009-11-26 16:07:54
Message-ID: 2779.1259251674@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> I assume you are fine with the addition of some info about git, but
> what about the removal of those two chapters suggested?

I agree that we needn't try to cover material that's in the CVS manual.
As somebody mentioned upthread, a sentence or two about our branching
and tagging conventions would be a lot more useful.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-11-26 16:14:54 Re: ecpg.addons
Previous Message Michael Meskes 2009-11-26 16:00:28 ecpg.addons