| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Dunstan <pgsql(at)tomd(dot)cc> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Matt Miller <pgsql(at)mattmillersf(dot)fastmail(dot)fm>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: "anyelement2" pseudotype |
| Date: | 2007-02-14 18:34:08 |
| Message-ID: | 27787.1171478048@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Dunstan <pgsql(at)tomd(dot)cc> writes:
> Regarding the type system understanding ANYENUM, most of the type system
> treats ANYENUM identically to ANYELEMENT, the only parts that really
> need to understand it are the bits that try to tie down concrete types.
The reason I'm feeling annoyed with ANYfoo stuff today is that yesterday
I had to put a special hack for ANYARRAY into the ri_triggers code,
which you'd think would have no concern with it. But perhaps this is
just an indication that we need to refactor the code in parse_coerce.c.
(The problem in ri_triggers is that it uses find_coercion_pathway()
which does not concern itself with ANYfoo types.)
Anyway, objection withdrawn --- I just thought it seemed a good idea to
question whether we were adding a frammish we didn't really need.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-02-14 18:56:03 | Re: HOT WIP Patch - version 1 |
| Previous Message | Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD | 2007-02-14 18:15:33 | Re: HOT WIP Patch - version 1 |