Re: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherited from template1

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Jan Wieck <janwieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherited from template1
Date: 2000-11-08 16:42:40
Message-ID: 27786.973701760@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> Where would you store the value if not in pg_database?

No other ideas at the moment. I was just wondering whether there was any
way to delete it entirely, but seems like we want to have the value for
template0 available. The old way of hardwiring knowledge into pg_dump
was definitely not as good.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-11-08 16:51:38 Re: Type resolution for operators
Previous Message Philip Warner 2000-11-08 16:24:05 Re: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherited from template1