Re: Lock partitions

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Mark Wong <markw(at)osdl(dot)org>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Lock partitions
Date: 2006-10-18 16:47:46
Message-ID: 27780.1161190066@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Mark Wong <markw(at)osdl(dot)org> writes:
> The number of transaction errors increased when I increased the
> NUM_LOCK_PARTITIONS, which I think is the reason it failed to run when I
> set it to 16.

Hmm, what sort of errors are we talking about? I wonder if you've
exposed a bug. Changing NUM_LOCK_PARTITIONS really shouldn't have any
semantic effect.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Wong 2006-10-18 16:54:08 Re: Lock partitions
Previous Message Teodor Sigaev 2006-10-18 15:52:15 Re: 8.1.5 is out