From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
Cc: | zhicheng wang <wang_zc(at)yahoo(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pg_class could not be found |
Date: | 2004-06-04 15:20:56 |
Message-ID: | 27779.1086362456@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> writes:
> Sigh. Sorry, that tool really needs some TLC to get it working across
> all the versions of PostgreSQL I don't have access to. It's looking for
> pg_class and is assuming it's OID 1259 and trying to open that file.
> Evidently it's failing.
I don't think it's a version issue; pg_class has always been OID 1259
(and relfilenode 1259, too). You might have version issues once you
started looking inside pg_class, but not before that.
Remember this is the guy whose disk drive seems to have committed major
sins of omission on his last shutdown. I think the file's probably just
plain gone :-(
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruno Wolff III | 2004-06-04 15:34:37 | Re: Insert increment based on a group by? |
Previous Message | zhicheng wang | 2004-06-04 15:10:40 | pg_xlog |